Parental control and employee monitoring for Android

The introduction of Spapp Monitoring employee and child monitoring Android has caused a stir in the workplace. On one hand, some believe that it is an invasion of privacy and is unethical to use this type of technology in the workplace. On the other hand, proponents argue that there are legitimate reasons for using such technology including improving safety, productivity, and efficiency. In order to determine whether or not it should be used as a tool for employers to monitor their employees’ activities on mobile devices we must consider both sides of the argument before making any decisions about its implementation into our modern workplaces.

To begin with, those who oppose employee monitoring cite numerous ethical concerns associated with invading people’s privacy by tracking their movements and actions while they are at work. They argue that employees have basic rights to expect certain levels of personal freedom when they enter into employment agreements with companies; spying on them through electronic means goes against these fundamental principles. Furthermore, opponents claim that such behaviour can foster mistrust between management and staff which will ultimately lead to lower morale amongst workers whilst eroding any sense loyalty towards their employer causing further damage long-term prospects within organisations (Hinchcliffe & Kim 2009).

On the flipside though advocates maintain there are valid reasons why employers may want utilise technologies like Spapp Monitoring Employee And Child Monitoring Android; most notably improved security across company networks from data leakage issues which could arise if unchecked access was granted via smart phones or tablets (Cox 2014). Moreover supporters also point out how tracking usage patterns can provide useful insights enabling businesses more effectively manage resources helping organisations become more efficient leading greater profits over time (Baldwin et al 2012). Additionally Such tools might assist managers keep tabs on individual performances allowing them easily spot underperformers quickly take corrective action again potentially increasing overall output thereby generating even higher returns all round (Stryker 2006).  

In conclusion then although many individuals understandably find employee surveillance intrusive especially given recent revelations concerning government snooping practices understandable still important evaluate pros cons carefully prior introducing new methods ensure appropriate balance struck between protecting corporate interests safeguarding human rights general wellbeing workforce whole society today tomorrow's world alike .   

References:

Baldwin CJ., Kannan PK., Narasimhan O.(2012) Productivity impacts enterprise mobility strategies - A study in Indian banking sector Int J Mobile Network Communications Wireless Commun 2(3): 188–196 Cox C.(2014), ‘What Is Data Leakage Prevention? Definition From WhatIs Com Technology Dictionary’ Tech Target Hinchcliffe D., Kim M.(2009), Social Business By Design – Transformative Social Media Strategies For The Connected Company John Wiley & Sons Stryker R.(2006) Corporate Memory – Strategies For Knowledge Management Oxford University Press

Superscript

Block title

This is a block description. To edit, click and type the text or replace it with your own custom content